1inattention, how they refuse to take any step beyond the borders of their “imagined and
misleading map.” It presents a record of the author’s conversation with several Christian
theologians.
People—whether they are Jews, Christians, or Muslims—trust their religious leaders. The
following dialogues with several educated Christians will give you an inside look into the
mindset of those who receive the support of about two billion Christians, who believe
they can be “saved” only If they follow what their leaders tell them. Let us begin with my
dialogue with a doctoral student of theology.
Sometime ago a family friend, Elizabeth, spoke about a relative, named Tom, who was
working on his doctorate in theology. She described Tom as having both an open and
sharp mind. Elizabeth suggested that I should call him and tell him about Bahá’u’lláh and
send him a copy of I Shall Come Again. To prepare Tom for the dialogue, Elizabeth told
him that I would call.
I am always curious and would like to know how people respond to an invitation or a
challenge. One evening I called Tom and asked if he had heard about the Bahá’í Faith. He
said he had studied the topic only in an introductory course during his undergraduate
years, and talked briefly with a few Bahá’ís. Then I referred to I Shall Come Again—
which covers biblical prophecies about the advent of Bahá’u’lláh—and asked if he
wanted to receive a free copy. He said he was quite busy with his studies and had no time
to read anything beyond what his professors required. He then indicated that he was quite
happy with his beliefs because he had serious problems earlier and since he had fully
accepted Jesus, he had lived an abundant life. He seemed quite friendly and displayed no
sign of impatience. So I decided to challenge him a little, and perhaps disturb his peace!
The following is a paraphrase of the exchange of ideas between us, written immediately
after our conversation:
• Me: Did you know that Bahá’u’lláh has fulfilled the biblical prophecies about the
second Advent?
• Tom: That is typical of those who make such claims. They take some prophecies and
apply them to themselves.
• Me: Can you give me an example?
2• Tom: Louis Farrakhan believes Jesus and Elijah are the same person. He believes he is
Elijah.
• Me: I agree; people abuse prophecies. The only way to know is to investigate each
claim.
• Tom: We already know how Christ will come. We have accumulated an abundance of
evidence about the way He will return. We have 2,000 years of interpretation. We
know Christ has not come again.
• Me: You base your faith on fallible interpreters. Do you realize that the Gospel gives
the right of interpretation only to the Lord? Do you realize we are told:
Therefore judge nothing before the appointed time; wait till the Lord comes. He
will bring to light what is hidden in darkness and will expose the motives of
men’s hearts. I Cor. 4:5
3• Tom: Some prophecies are clear. They do not need any interpretation. For instance, we
are told in plain language that the same Jesus will come again. Is Bahá’u’lláh the same
person who came as Jesus?
• Me: Bahá’u’lláh did not have the body of Jesus, but manifested the Spirit of God, the
same Spirit that appeared in Jesus. Did not Jesus say:
The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. John 6:63 NIV
Do you realize that your literal interpretation of prophecies is based on tradition? The
Pharisees did the same. They followed their ancestral beliefs and denied Jesus.
• Tom: Pharisees had to deny Jesus, because prophecies predicted that they would.
At this point, I heard the alarm signal! I recognized that I could find no way to Tom’s
heart. First, even if the Pharisees had to deny Jesus, they were still wrong. And second,
the Pharisees did not have to deny Jesus. Why would God force a person to deny His
Messenger and then punish him for doing so? Why would Jesus force a few ignorant
people to engage in a horrible act and then condemn them for doing it? I did not raise any
one of these questions. To do so would have turned the friendly dialogue into a stressful
argument. I respected his decision to keep his heart closed.
His response demonstrates how the desire to win overcomes the simple rules of reason; it
shows how a passionate need for protecting one’s belief subdues the rational powers.
Tom showed no thirst for learning about Bahá’u’lláh. I was not looking for a victory, and
stopped at the right moment. Why would anyone force his way into a locked house,
unless he is a burglar? Why give a glass of water to someone who is not thirsty:
The wise are they that speak not unless they obtain a hearing, even as the cup-bearer,
who proffereth not his cup till he findeth a seeker, and the lover who crieth not out
from the depths of his heart until he gazeth upon the beauty of his beloved. Wherefore
sow the seeds of wisdom and knowledge in the pure soil of the heart…1 Bahá’u’lláh
God has given each soul the right to protect and preserve his or her spiritual possessions.
But I have to admit that at times like this, it is so tempting to go on. The desire to break
the lock is ever-present, the need for winning feels almost as natural as breathing.
4The attempts made by certain believers to break this lock by force has immensely
damaged and even destroyed the dignity of religion. What would happen to the price of
gold if people went around, knocked on doors, got the householders out of their bed, and
asked them, and even argued with them, that they must accept free chunks of gold?
Any time we engage in a debate or argument about religion, we are violating God’s
principle of freedom, we are dragging a person into His Kingdom. Our Creator has taught
us again and again that He does not want reluctant guests in His banquet. The only
responsibility we have is to invite and inform. Resistance to an invitation must be met
instantly by submission, silence, and acknowledgment of the principle of freedom. When
a person argues, as I think Tom began to do, he is sending a clear signal that I do not want
your gift.
We must show unqualified respect to all those who say, “No!” to God’s invitation to His
heavenly banquet. Because they are exercising the right of freedom that God gave them.
Respecting them is respecting God, and disrespecting them is disrespecting God, the
original Designer. The beauty of divine Drama comes from diversity.
Tom asked no question about Bahá’u’lláh except to say, “Is He the same person as
Jesus?” And if I had said yes, he could ask, “Did he have holes in his body?” And if I had
said yes, he could ask, “How many holes were there?” And if I had said the right number,
he could ask, “Were they all in the right place?” And if I had said yes, he could ask, “Are
there pictures to prove it?” And if I had said yes, he could ask, “Is there any evidence that
the pictures are authentic?” And if I had said yes, he could ask, “Did he have the same
height and weight as Jesus?” And if I had said yes, he could ask, “Did he have the same
skin color?” And if I had said yes, he could ask, “Are there x-rays to show that some of
his joints were separated?” And if I had said yes, he could ask, “Did He speak Hebrew,
Greek, or Aramaic as He did in ancient times? And if I had said yes, he could say, “Is
there any recording of his voice?” And if I had said yes, he could say, “Your answers are
all too good to be true, and they are!”
As this example demonstrates, where there is a will, there will always be a way to deny
any truth, no matter how evident it may be. Tom knew he was right and no evidence, no
proof, no testimonial could convince him otherwise. How would he respond, if he
confronted the same Jesus who came 2,000 years ago exactly as He appeared then?
Would he repeat the same arguments the Pharisees pursued?
A prophecy often quoted by Christian scholars about the first advent of Christ indicates
that all of Messiah’s bones will be “out of joint” (Psalms 22:12). I could have asked him
if he has any evidence to prove this. Did crucifixion make all Jesus’ bones to be
disjointed? Another frequently quoted prophecy (Isaiah 53:10) about the first advent
declares that Messiah will be “pierced for our transgression” and then it states that “He
will see His offspring.” I could have asked him, “Who was Jesus’ offspring?”
To continue the discussion, I felt, was a waste of time and money. This was a long-
distance call! When he said, “The Pharisees had to deny Jesus,” I gently changed the
subject. Our conversation ended on a friendly note. I saw Tom anxious to be well
prepared for his course and university tests, but not for a test that would determine the
course of his eternal destiny. How perfectly St. Paul predicted Tom’s response:
5They are the kind…who are…always learning but never able to acknowledge the
truth. II Timothy 3:6-7
Theology students must master an enormous amount of detailed information about
biblical studies, and ancient and modern languages. As we noted, Tom said he could not
read about Bahá’u’lláh because of his enormous studies. He was learning German and
two ancient languages. Notice how Bahá’u’lláh describes his status and that of today’s
many Bible students and scholars:
They cleave to the obscure intricacies of knowledge, when He, Who is the Object of
all knowledge, shineth as the sun. They see the sun with their own eyes, and yet
question that brilliant Orb as to the proof of its light.2 Bahá’u’lláh
Who were the scribes? According to Christian scholar F.F. Bruce, they were “the
acknowledged students and teachers of the law.” In a way, ancient scribes can be
compared to today’s Bible scholars and professors who teach at seminary schools.
According to Unger’s Bible Dictionary:
The higher the law rose in the estimation of the people, the more did its study and
exposition become an independent business; and an independent class of “biblical
scholars or scribes,” [who] were the real teachers of the people…3
How did the scribes respond to Jesus? Did their knowledge of the law of God serve as a
beam of light to lead them to truth or as a veil of darkness to deprive them of truth?
According to Harper’s Bible Dictionary:
The scribes, like the Pharisees with whom their name is often linked in the N.T., were
opposed to Jesus (Matt. 7:29), because he sometimes cut across their ancient traditions
and exposed their unwarranted claims to prestige. Scribes played a conspicuous role in
bringing about his Crucifixion (Mark 14:43, 15:1; Luke 23:10), though a few of them
believed in his teaching (Matt. 8:19).4
Once again we can clearly see that there is no link whatsoever between being a scholar
and being a truth lover. Yet most people have throughout all ages delegated their spiritual
responsibility to their leaders who are taught by religious scholars at institutions of higher
learning. They assume that if someone knows Greek and Hebrew and has taken numerous
courses in seminary schools or has taught at institutions of higher learning, he is the one
who must lead them.
Suppose you are a sophomore at college. You are taking an introductory course in
biology. At the end of the semester your teacher tells you that you should look forward to
your next instructor, who will offer an advanced course in biology. Then he adds, “Trust
this teacher. He is quite knowledgeable.” Let us assume you register for this advanced
course and go to the class and wait for the instructor. Now suppose suddenly a man enters
the classroom and starts teaching. How should you respond? Should you start by saying,
“You are not the instructor?” Or should you listen to him for a while to see if he sounds
like one? Is not rejecting him without listening to him an unreasonable act? And yet
according to our experience in Mt. Pleasant, where I live, two percent of Christian leaders
requested a free book about the biblical prophecies fulfilled by Bahá’u’lláh. Out of more
than fifty only one pastor asked for a copy and another called to say that he already knew
that we were wrong, and that he did not need a book as further evidence.
6Concerning the new instructor, should the students cling to their ideas about how he
should look, or should they listen to him? Should they not give him a hearing? Why then
are the religious scholars and students not examining the evidence Bahá’u’lláh presents?
Why are they closing their hearts and minds? Why are they walking out of the classroom?
How can a student test an instructor without listening to him? Are the students not asked
by their previous instructor to refrain from making any judgment about difficult issues?
Therefore judge nothing before the appointed time; wait till the Lord comes. He will
bring to light what is hidden in darkness and will expose the motives of men’s
hearts. I Corinthians 4:5 NIV
Why are the students not listening to those instructions? Why are they telling the
instructor that he is wrong before even listening to him? Why are they assuming that they
already have the answer to difficult questions?
The story of Bahá’u’lláh is so astounding, the biblical evidence for His divine origin is so
compelling that every seminary school should offer at least one course about Him. I
wonder if Bahá’u’lláh is even mentioned in those schools. Students are kept within the
confine of Christian theology. It is assumed nothing else is worth studying.
What the majority of people believe comes from their pastors and priests. And what the
majority of pastors and priests believe comes from what their professors at seminary
school taught them. Those professors are the true shakers and shapers of Christian’s
beliefs. They are highly respected as the authority on what the Bible means. As a rule,
these scholars are financially supported by a given denomination. Does it make sense to
undermine the institution that feeds you? Safety—the second most significant human
need—lies in preserving the status quo rather than risking for the unknown. This is why it
is so difficult to make a change. The system is closed. Many people mistake
“scholarship” for love for truth. They are entirely different. There are some theology
professors who are in heart agnostics and atheists!
Whether Christians realize it or not, most of their beliefs come from scholars and
university professors. That is where they originate and trickle down to others. Is it
prudent to put the most important decision of one’s life—the one that determines one’s
eternal destiny—mainly in the hands of professors at seminary schools?
Does knowing, loving, and “seeing” God require a Ph.D. (Doctor of Philosophy), or a
P.H. (a Pure Heart)?
Does knowing the truth require a D.TH. (Doctor of Theology) or D.T. (Detachment from
Traditions)?
You have a fine way of setting aside the commands of God in order to observe your
own traditions! Christ (Mark 7:9)
Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God. Christ (Matt. 5:8)
7Let me now cite another personal experience to show you what is going on in theological
schools in the United States, where ministers are trained. When I was in Dallas, I decided
to visit a famous seminary college. I wanted to offer to the library and to the professors a
few books that would give the students and the faculty a new outlook on prophecies.
8They were three large books I have written to show that all prophecies of the Second
Advent have been fulfilled by the Báb and Bahá’u’lláh.•
First I went to the library, offered the books to the librarian and asked if he would accept
them. He said, “Come back couple of hours later and I will let you know.” When I
returned, he said “No, these books do not serve our needs.”
Then I decided to offer the books to the professors. While walking through a building,
looking for their offices, a security guard asked me why I had entered the building. When
I told him my purpose, he said: “You cannot do this. You must have permission.” I said,
“Please show me the office of the dean, where I can get permission.”
When I entered the dean’s office, greeted him, and told him that I wanted to offer some
books to the professors, he looked at me with much suspicion, as if I was a thief, and
firmly said: “I do not give you such a permission!” When I asked why? He said, “I must
guard them!” I could not believe what I heard. Why would professors of theology need to
be guarded against new ideas? They must be the vanguards of knowledge, not be
guarded against knowledge.
I wanted to start a dialogue with him. But his facial expression showed that he had no
desire to talk to me. He saw me as an invader or a robber who had come to take away his
precious faith. I found his response amusing. I do my best to be humble, but in this case I
felt somewhat powerful! I was standing in front of someone in charge of professors of
theology in a famous Christian college, and he was afraid of me! What a blessing it was!
By speaking very gently and humbly with him, I enticed him to ask me questions. I have
presented a record of this dialogue in another book, written specifically on the negative
role of religious leaders on the spiritual destiny of humankind. The information offered
gives you a picture of the mindset that controls most religious scholars and authorities.
What can we learn from this encounter? That the one who trains the pastors fails to obey
the most reasonable instructions from his Redeemer—the One he worships! He refuses to
pay any attention to the news of His coming! He refuses to practice the most emphatic
and repeated instruction and commandment from his Master, such as:
Be always on the watch! Christ (Luke 21:36 NIV)
I will come upon you as a thief. Christ (Rev. 3:3 NKJ)
…unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time. Hebrews 9:28 NIV
Not only he refused to pay attention, he succeeded in preventing me from sharing this
urgent Message with the professors under his “guard!” After all, he saw himself as their
shepherd. The librarian did the same: He guarded the students—the future ministers—
from gaining a new perspective on prophecies!
Those in positions of power have always feared the light of knowledge and tried to keep
people in ignorance:
…the Jews had decided that anyone who acknowledged that Jesus was the Christ
would be put out of the synagogue. John 9:22 NIV
9•
I Shall Come Again, 522 pages; Lord of Lords, 634 pages; King of Kings, 510 pages.
10Professors of theology must spread the knowledge of God. They must be open to new
ideas. How can three books in a library hurt anyone? The ones I met practiced the exact
opposite of what they were asked to do. They made these verses to come true:
My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. Because you have rejected
knowledge, I also will reject you from being priest for Me; Because you have
forgotten the law of your God…I will change their glory into shame. Hosea 4:6-7 NKJ
But many who are first will be last, and many who are last will be first
. Christ (Matt. 19:30 NIV)
I thank thee, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, for hiding these things [the truth] from
the learned and wise, and revealing them to the simple. Yes, Father, such was your
choice. Christ (Matt. 11:25-26 NEB)
Let me now share with you the story of my last few hours in that seminary. By now, it
was 3:00 p.m. I said to myself: “Why not meet the president of the seminary? I stepped
into his office and told his secretary that I had come to offer him a few books.
Fortunately, he was free and allowed me to see him. He was a young man, very courteous
and kind. He received me warmly and asked me several questions. In response, I quoted
many Biblical verses to support my message. He listened with interest and did not
challenge me on anything I said. He simply wanted to know who I was and what was my
mission.
I reminded him that the Jews misunderstood the prophecies and asked him: “What makes
Christians to think that they have more insight than they did?” He listened and offered no
response.
He warmly accepted the three volumes for his own library and promised to examine them
and invite me later to return to the seminary for a dialogue with a few professors who
specialized in religions other than Christianity and Judaism.
I waited a few weeks for his call, but the promised invitation never came. When I was in
Dallas a year later, I called his secretary and asked for a second visit, but he declined to
meet me.
My experience in this seminary is one isolated incident and should not be generalized to
all religious leaders and teachers. Nevertheless, it gives us a glimpse of the mindset of
those who are in charge of the spiritual destiny of humankind.
This was all about a Christian seminary. What about Muslim seminaries? What would
happen if I entered a Muslim seminary? I do not know, but I would love to know! It
would be a great adventure! Many Christians do not know that the Sunni branch of Islám,
just like Christians, expect the return of Jesus, whom they call: The Spirit of God.
Sometime ago, Dr. Lou Meyer—a Catholic priest—made a “teaching trip” throughout the
United States to spread the news of the Second Coming. We had the honor of having him
in our home as a guest for a few days. His talk centered on the reasons he had recognized
Bahá’u’lláh as the return of Christ. When I asked him about the response of other priests
to the news of the advent of Bahá’u’lláh, he said that some of his old friends and teachers
listened, out of courtesy, to the news, but showed no interest. The director of a large
seminary school in the United States asked him for this favor: “Talk about any subject
11you want, but say nothing about the return of Christ to any one of the seminary
students at the university!” Such a request is astonishing. Why should the future
religious leaders remain ignorant of this most magnificent news? Is this the meaning of
“seek and ye shall find”? Why should the future religious leaders live in ignorance of the
very reason for which they live, and of the very purpose for which they go to seminary
school?
I entreat Thee, O Thou Who art my Companion and my Best-Beloved, to lift the veil
that hath come in between Thee and Thy servants, that they may recognize Thee with
Thine own eye and rid themselves of all attachment to any one but Thee. Thou art,
verily, the Almighty, the Ever-Forgiving, the Most Compassionate.5 Bahá’u’lláh