1The following dialogue did actually take place; it is not fiction.
Recently a family friend, Elizabeth, was telling us about a
relative, named Tom, who was working on his doctorate in
theology. She described Tom as having both an open and sharp
mind. Elizabeth suggested that I should call him and tell him
about Bahá’u’lláh and send him a copy of I Shall Come Again.
To prepare Tom for the dialogue, Elizabeth told him that I
would call.
I am always curious and would like to know how people respond
to an invitation or a challenge. One evening I called Tom and
asked if he had heard about the Bahá’í Faith. He said he had
studied the topic only in an introductory course during his
undergraduate years, and had talked briefly with a few Bahá’ís.
I then referred to I Shall Come Again—which covers biblical
prophecies about the advent of Bahá’u’lláh—and asked if he
wanted to receive a free copy. He said he was quite busy with
his studies and had no time to read anything beyond what his
professors required. He then indicated that he was quite happy
with his beliefs because he had serious problems earlier, and
since he had fully accepted Jesus, he now lived an abundant life.
He seemed quite friendly and displayed no sign of impatience.
So I decided to challenge him a little, and perhaps disturb his
peace! The following is a paraphrase of the exchange of ideas
between us, written immediately after our conversation:
• Me: Did you know that Bahá’u’lláh has fulfilled the biblical
prophecies about the Second Advent?
• Tom: That is typical of those who make such claims. They
take some prophecies and apply them to themselves.
• Me: Can you give an example?
• Tom: Louis Farrakhan believes Jesus and Elijah are the same
person. He believes he is Elijah.
• Me: I agree; people abuse prophecies. The only way to know
is to investigate each claim.
• Tom: We already know how Christ will come. We have
accumulated an abundance of evidence about the way He
will return. We have 2,000 years of interpretation. We know
Christ has not come again.
• Me: You base your faith on fallible interpreters. Do you
realize that the Gospel gives the right of interpretation only
to the Lord? Do you realize we are told:
Therefore judge nothing before the appointed time; wait
till the Lord comes. He will bring to light what is hidden
in darkness and will expose the motives of men’s hearts.
I Cor. 4:5
• Tom: Some prophecies are clear. They do not need any
interpretation. For instance, we are told in plain language
that the same Jesus will come again. Is Bahá’u’lláh the same
person who came as Jesus?
• Me: Bahá’u’lláh did not have the body of Jesus, but mani-
fested the Spirit of God, the same Spirit that appeared in
Jesus. Do you realize that your literal interpretation of
prophecies is based on tradition? The Pharisees did the
same. They followed their ancestral beliefs and denied
Jesus.
• Tom: Pharisees had to deny Jesus, because prophecies pre-
dicted that they would.
At this point, I heard the alarm signal! I recognized that I could
find no way to Tom’s heart. First, even if the Pharisees had to
deny Jesus, they were still wrong. And second, the Pharisees did
not have to deny Jesus. Why would God force a person to deny
His Messenger and then punish him for doing so? Why would
Jesus force a few ignorant people to engage in a horrible act and
then condemn them for doing it? I did not raise any one of these
questions. To do so would have turned the friendly dialogue into
2a stressful argument. I respected his decision to keep his heart
closed.
His response demonstrates how the desire to win overcomes the
simple rules of reason; it shows how a passionate need to
protect one’s belief subdues the rational powers. Tom showed
no thirst for learning about Bahá’u’lláh. I was not looking for a
victory, and stopped at the right moment. Why would anyone
force his way into a locked house, unless he is a burglar? God
has given each soul the right to protect and preserve his or her
spiritual possessions. But I have to admit that, at times like this,
it is so tempting to go on. The desire to break the lock is ever-
present, the need to win feels almost as natural as breathing.
The attempts made by certain believers to break this lock by
force has immensely damaged and even destroyed the dignity of
religion. What would happen to the price of gold if people went
around, knocked on doors, got the householders out of their
bed, then asked them, and even argued with them, that they
must accept free chunks of gold?
Any time we engage in a debate or argument about religion, we
are violating God’s principle of freedom, we are dragging a
person into His Kingdom. Our Creator has taught us again and
again that He does not want reluctant guests in His banquet. The
only responsibility we have is to invite and inform. Resistance
to an invitation must be met instantly by submission, silence,
and an acknowledgment of the principle of freedom. When a
person argues, as I think Tom began to do, he is sending a clear
signal that I do not want your gift.
We must show unqualified respect to all those who say, “No!”
to God’s invitation to His heavenly banquet because they are
exercising the right of freedom that God gave them. Respecting
them is respecting God, and disrespecting them is disrespecting
God, the original Designer. The beauty of the divine Drama
comes from diversity.
Tom asked no question about Bahá’u’lláh except to say, “Is He
the same person as Jesus?” If I had said yes, he could ask, “Did
he have holes in his body?” And if I had said yes, he could ask,
3“How many holes were there?” And if I had said the right
number, he could ask, “Were they all in the right place?” And if
I had said yes, he could ask, “Are there pictures to prove it?”
And if I had said yes, he could ask, “Is there any evidence that
the pictures are authentic?” And if I had said yes, he could ask,
“Did he have the same height and weight as Jesus?” And if I
had said yes, he could ask, “Did he have the same skin color?”
And if I had said yes, he could ask, “Are there x-rays to show
that some of his joints were separated?” And if I had said yes,
he could ask, “Did He speak Hebrew, Greek, or Aramaic as He
did in ancient times? And if I had said yes, he could say, “Is
there any recording of his voice?” And if I had said yes, he
would probably say, “Your answers are all too good to be true,”
and they were!
As this theoretical dialogue demonstrates, where there is a will,
there will always be a way to deny any truth, no matter how
evident it may be. Tom knew he was right and no evidence, no
proof, no testimonial could have convinced him otherwise. How
would he respond, if he was confronted by the same Jesus who
came 2,000 years ago exactly as He appeared then? Would he
repeat the same arguments the Pharisees pursued?
A prophecy often quoted by Christian scholars about the First
Advent of Christ indicates that all of Messiah’s bones will be
“out of joint” (Psalms 22:12). I could have asked him if he has
any evidence to prove this. Did crucifixion disjoint all of Jesus’
bones? Another frequently quoted prophecy (Isaiah 53:10)
about the first advent declares that the Messiah will be “pierced
for our transgression” and then it states that “He will see His
offspring.” I could have asked him, “Who was Jesus’
offspring?”
To continue the discussion, I felt, was a waste of time and
money. This was a long-distance call! When he said, “The
Pharisees had to deny Jesus,” I gently changed the subject. Our
conversation ended on a friendly note. I saw Tom anxious to be
well prepared for his course and university tests, but not for a
test that would determine the course of his eternal destiny. How
perfectly St. Paul predicted Tom’s response:
They are the kind…who are…always learning but never
able to acknowledge the truth. II Timothy 3:6-7
Theology students must master an enormous amount of detailed
information about biblical studies, and ancient and modern
languages. As we noted, Tom said he could not read about
Bahá’u’lláh because of his enormous studies. He was learning
German and two ancient languages. Note how Bahá’u’lláh
describes his status and that of today’s many Bible students and
scholars:
They cleave to the obscure intricacies of knowledge, when
He, Who is the Object of all knowledge, shineth as the sun.
They see the sun with their own eyes, and yet question that
brilliant Orb as to the proof of its light.15 Bahá’u’lláh
Who were the scribes? According to Christian scholar F. F.
Bruce, they were “the acknowledged students and teachers of
the law.” In a way, ancient scribes can be compared to today’s
Bible scholars and professors at seminary schools. According to
Unger’s Bible Dictionary:
The higher the law rose in the estimation of the people, the
more did its study and exposition become an independent
business; and an independent class of “biblical scholars or
scribes,” [who] were the real teachers of the people…16
How did the scribes respond to Jesus? Did their knowledge of
the law of God serve as a beam of light to lead them to truth or
as a veil of darkness to deprive them of truth? According to
Harper’s Bible Dictionary:
The scribes, like the Pharisees with whom their name is often
linked in the N.T., were opposed to Jesus (Matt. 7:29),
because he sometimes cut across their ancient traditions and
exposed their unwarranted claims to prestige. Scribes played
a conspicuous role in bringing about his Crucifixion (Mark
14:43, 15:1; Luke 23:10), though a few of them believed in
his teaching (Matt. 8:19).17
Once again we can clearly see that there is no link whatsoever
between being a scholar and being a truth lover. Yet most people
have throughout all ages delegated their spiritual responsibility
5to their leaders who are taught by religious scholars from
institutions of higher learning. They assume that if someone
knows Greek and Hebrew and has taken numerous courses in
seminary schools, or has taught at institutions of higher learn-
ing, then he is the one who must lead them to their destiny.
Suppose you are a university student, taking an introductory
course in biology. At the end of the semester your teacher tells
you that you should look forward to meeting your next instruc-
tor, who will offer an advanced course in biology. Then he adds,
“Trust this teacher. He is quite knowledgeable.” Let us assume
you register for this advanced course, go to the class and wait
for the instructor. Now suppose a man suddenly enters the class-
room and starts teaching. How should you respond? Should you
start by saying, “You are not the instructor?” Or should you listen
to him for a while to see if he sounds like one? Is not rejecting
him, without listening to him, an unreasonable act? And yet,
according to our experience in Mt. Pleasant, where I live,
Christian leaders showed little if any interest in receiving a free
book about the biblical prophecies fulfilled by Bahá’u’lláh. Out
of more than fifty only one pastor asked for a copy, and another
called to say that he already knew that we were wrong, and that
he did not need a book as further evidence. We later discovered
that the pastor who requested a copy, threw it away without
reading it! To him, removing even one copy out of circulation
was a good deed!
Concerning the new instructor, should the students cling to their
ideas about how he should look, or should they listen to him?
Should they not give him a hearing? Why then are the religious
scholars and students not examining the evidence Bahá’u’lláh
presents? Why are they closing their hearts and minds? Why are
they walking out of the classroom? How can a student judge an
instructor without listening to him? Were the students not asked
by their previous instructor to refrain from making any judg-
ment about difficult issues? Were they not instructed to wait for
the Lord to bring to light what was hidden in darkness?
Therefore judge nothing before the appointed time; wait till
the Lord comes. He will bring to light what is hidden in
darkness and will expose the motives of men’s hearts.
I Corinthians 4:5 NIV
Why are the students not listening to those instructions? Why
are they telling the instructor that he is wrong before they even
listen to him? Why are they assuming that they already have the
answer to difficult questions?
The story of Bahá’u’lláh is so astounding, the biblical evidence
for His divine origin is so compelling that every seminary
school should offer at least one course about Him. I wonder if
Bahá’u’lláh is even mentioned in those schools. Students are
kept within the confines of Christian theology. It is assumed
nothing else is worth studying.
What the majority of people believe comes from their pastors
and priests. And what the majority of pastors and priests believe
comes from what their professors at seminary school taught
them. Those professors are the true shakers and shapers of
Christian’s beliefs. They are highly respected as the authority on
what the Bible means. As a rule, these scholars are financially
supported by a given denomination. Does it make sense to
undermine the institution that feeds you? Safety—the second
most significant human need—lies in preserving the status quo
rather than taking risks for the unknown. This is why it is so
difficult to make a change. The system is closed. Many people
mistake “scholarship” for love for truth. But these two attributes
are not necessarily related. In fact, they are entirely different.
There are some theology professors who are in heart agnostics
and atheists!
Whether Christians realize it or not, most of their beliefs come
from scholars and university professors. That is where the
majority of their views about the meaning of the Scriptures
originate and gradually trickle down to others. Is it then prudent
to place by far the most important decision of our lives—the
one that determines our everlasting destiny—mainly in the
hands of professors at seminary schools?
7Does knowing, loving, and “seeing” God require a Ph.D. (Doctor
of Philosophy), or a P.H. (a Pure Heart)?
Does knowing the truth require a D.TH. (Doctor of Theology)
or D.T. (Detachment from Traditions)?
You have a fine way of setting aside the commands of God
in order to observe your own traditions! Christ (Mark 7:9)
Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.
Christ (Matt. 5:8)